An extremely important point, well made.
A lot of television and radio shows, particularly news or discussion shows, approach things on the principle of balance. You’ve got to show both sides of the debate and give them equal air-time.
So you get expert number one, Chicken Little, come on and say “The sky is falling, the sky is falling”
Expert number two, puts the counter position “The sky isn’t falling, the principles of gravity don’t work that way, and in the unlikely even that the sky was ever to fall, here would be some catastrophic signs and evidence that we would get”
And then the presenter wraps up, often with the expression “Well, the controversy rages on”
So the listener/viewer doesn’t learn much more than that some people think the sky is falling, others think it isn’t. Some people think that Evolution is a load of nonsense and that the existence of bananas prove that*, others…
View original post 1,086 more words